Admiral Harry Harris, commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, told the New York Times regarding T. R. Fehrenbach's definitive book covering the Korean War, "This Kind of War": "He says the United States was not ready. It is really a powerful book."
Fehrenbach did indeed write a scathing indictment of the readiness of the U.S. military after WWII, so much so that the fiftieth anniversary edition, released in 2000 -- the fiftieth anniversary of the start of the war, not the publishing of the book -- included in the new forward written by the 32nd Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, Gordon Sullivan: "That may have been true in 1962, but it isn't necessarily true today." The U.S. military could hardly have been less prepared in 1950. Fehrenbach wrote of the attitude at the time regarding discipline: "Basically, there were two ways to reduce abuses of power in the service. One was to overhaul the officer procurement system, make damned certain that no merely average man could ever be commissioned, and have fewer officers, but better ones. The other way was to reduce the power to abuse any body." We chose the latter. The Doolittle Board's The Report of the Secretary of War's Board on Officer-Enlisted Man Relationships, a/k/a the 1946 Doolittle Report, advised to sissify the Army, resulting in officers being unable to control their troops who would back-talk their commanders and engage mainly in activities that interested them, usually involving sex and/or money. The Marines avoided this nonsense and stuck to their traditions. Your author wonders whether Fehrenbach ever viewed the classic comedy movie Ninotchka, with Greta Garbo uttering the memorable line, referring to the Soviet purges of the 1930s: "The last mass trials were a great success. There are going to be fewer, but better Russians." In any case, we are reminded of the Obama and Biden Administrations' efforts to remake the military in a feminine, homosexual, and transgender image, 1950 revisited. The partisan and politically correct New York Times opined that "there were already thousands of transgender people in the military," but that laughable estimate originated with the Palm Center, an organization of LGBTs the sole purpose of which was to coerce the military into accepting LGBTs, hardly an unbiased source. The only other source of LGBT statistics is the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy, another LGBT lobbyist. We were unprepared for Pearl Harbor and the invasion of South Korea by the DPRK. Leftists are determined to make us learn the lesson of preparedness again. And it's no surprise that the military is having trouble recruiting, given that most potential recruits tend to be conservative, exactly the opposite of woke. Fehrenbach compared the poorly prepared Americans and ROK troops with the hardened troops of North Korea, who attacked all across the border at 4:00 am on June 25, 1950. The surprise attack caused the American and ROK forces to retreat to a small amount of territory on the far south-east corner of the peninsula, the Pusan perimeter, before the Inchon landings turned the tide. Then when "dugout Doug" MacArthur ordered his troops to move to the Yalu River and China invaded in the millions, both the Marines in the east and the Army in the west were forced to retreat. But the behavior of the Marines and Army could not have been more different. The Marines lashed their wounded to the tops of jeeps and trucks, truly their finest hour, while the Army, in a mad dash for safety, often left their wounded to be bayoneted later by the fanatical North Koreans. This is just one example why the Marines are so adamant about retaining the policies which have worked in many battles. Politicizing military culture will end in disaster. Fehrenbach started his book with an introduction to Korea, to which he usually referred by the name the natives use for it, Chosun. He noted that Chosun was a springboard for China, Russia, and Japan, the last of which annexed the peninsula in 1910. He explained: "The cause of collision was not the poor land of Chosun with its teeming millions, but vast and wealthy Manchuria, looming high beyond the Yalu. Manchuria is the richest area in East Asia, with iron ores, coal, water, power, food, and timber, and whoever owns Manchuria, to be secure, must also own Chosun." Ito Marquis arrived at Seoul as the official representative of the Japanese Government. Through threats and trickery, as well as a pistol pointed to the head of the prime minister, he was able to force the king and Cabinet to agree to Korea becoming a province of Japan, suggesting to the military commander in Korea, General Hasegawa Yoshimichi, that he "march his men about for exercise and that the horse artillery indulge in target practice" to convert the government of Korea into servile supplicants. In 1924, the Reverend Edward W. Twing of Boston, Oriental Secretary of the International Reform Bureau, visited Korea. His reports are some of the only ones we have of the time, given that Japan treated Korea as its private domain. Fehrenbach regaled us with the actions of Twing: "One day Mr. Twing saw a group of Korean girls of school age shout "Manzai" -- which means merely 'Hoorah' -- at passing Japanese soldiers. The Japanese immediately opened fire on them. Another group of school girls walking down the road, not even shouting, were set upon by the angry troops. The Japanese beat them with rifle butts, knocked them down, tore away their clothing. Then, as Mr. Twing related back in Boston, 'the soldiers treated them in a most shameful manner.' The Koreans had to be taught that they were inseparably citizens of the empire, whatever the class rating of their citizenship might be. They were taught so well that, during three months of 1919, more than fifty thousand of them were killed or at least hospitalized by the lesson. Above all, Mr. Twing reported back,the Japanese were out to teach Korean Christian converts that contact with the philosophies of the West was dangerous. And it was. Christian men and women were dragged into Shinto temples, tied to crosses, and beaten savagely. Young girls of Christian families were stripped, fastened to telegraph poles by their hair, flogged, and left exposed to public view." Twing had much in common with Armin T. Wegner, a second-lieutenant in the German army stationed in the Ottoman Empire in April 1915, who took photographs of the horror inflicted by Ottoman Muslims upon Armenians, Assyrians, Greeks, and other Christians. If not for Wegner's graphic photos, we might be influenced by Turkey's President-for-life Recep Tayyip Erdogan who condemned the Pope for classifying the slaughter of millions of Christians as genocide, preferring to term it merely a civil war, even though civil wars do not usually have the vast majority of deaths on only one side. Erdogan also declared: "Democracy is like a train. We shall get out when we arrive at the station we want." Another parallel with the Armenian Genocide is the treatment of Christian girls. Twing noted that Korean girls were stripped, tied to crosses, and left to remain on public view. The same thing happened to Armenian girls, with a movie, the "Auction of Souls," depicting the events. Fehrenbach summarized the section by stating that "survivors of Nanking, Malaya, and the Bataan Death March ... would have understood what Mr. Twing was talking about." Readers should remember that Fehrenbach's book was published in 1963, only a few years after Kishi Nobusuke, prime minister from 1957-1960 and Japan's most corrupt leader in modern times, was in power, and one year before Sato Eisaku, prime minister from 1964-1972, was in power, with Kishi being the grandfather of the current Japanese prime minister, Abe Shinzo, and Sato being Kishi's brother. Kishi was a Class A war criminal and due to hang until 1948 when the U.S. government decided it needed him to fight communism. Twing's reports should be taken into consideration the next time a Japanese politician claims that the 200,000 comfort women, women the Japanese military used as sex slaves, were "smiling volunteers." Japan also tried to destroy Korean culture, with Fehrenbach writing of "the great reforms the Japanese had [supposedly] instituted in Korea, and of which they eternally boasted": "The Japanese had reformed the ancient tongue of Chosun, Mr. Twing said, by abolishing it. Korean archives and treasures of literature were purified by burning, since there was no place in the bright new twentieth century for a separate Korean culture. Not only was Japanese the official language of Korean courts; it was the only one allowed in the schools." The policy was enforced ruthlessly and violently, with "mandatory flogging for minor offenses" and "the reintroduction of an ancient tool, the rack." If this was how the occupying Japanese treated Koreans before WWII, just imagine how savage they were during the war to POWs and all others who fell under Japanese control. The commander of Lieutenant Kikuchi Masaichi, commanding an airfield defense unit in Singapore early in 1945, was told regarding his 300 POWs: "When you're finished, you can do what you like with them. If I was you, I'd shove them into a tunnel with a few demolition charges." Japanese school textbooks only include two footnotes regarding the comfort women and the 1937-38 Nanjing Massacre where anywhere from 150,000 to 300,000 people were slaughtered. The Manila Massacre, with 100,000 deaths, does not even rate a mention. The despicable crimes of Unit 731, where hundreds of thousands of people were used as human guinea pigs in ghastly experiments ranging from being dissected alive without anesthesia to being exposed to all manner of chemical and biological agents were made much worse by the U.S. government granting their freedom in exchange for their knowledge and research materials. Not surprisingly, a 2006 survey of Japanese people found that 34% believed that the Tokyo Trials were an unjust and unilateral judgment of the defeated nations by the victor nations. One reason the Japanese can hold their ignorant point of view is that we foolishly allowed them to destroy most of the evidence of their crimes while we established the occupation, as compared to the Nazi death camps which were overrun while still in operation. On the other side, the Chinese Military Museum of the Chinese People's Revolution, Hall of the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, and North Korean Sinchon Museum of US War Atrocities neglect to mention the fact that North Korea attacked first. China is militarizing the South China Sea, even though the entire world holds that it is shared between the countries in the region. China is extending its security borders far beyond its actual ones, similar to how it views North Korea as a buffer zone against the West. Some books never lose their appeal.
0 Comments
To understand the magnitude of the industrial capacity during WWII in the US, we need to look at the manufacturers of a few weapons systems.
The M1 Garand was manufactured by Springfield Armory, Winchester Repeating Arms, Harrington & Richardson, and International Harvester. The M1 Carbine was manufactured by Inland Division of General Motors, Winchester Repeating Arms, Saginaw Steering Gear Division of General Motors, Irwin-Pedersen (operated by Saginaw Steering Gear), Underwood Elliot Fisher, National Postal Meter, Quality Hardware Manufacturing Corporation, International Business Machines (IBM), Standard Products, Commercial Controls Corporation, and Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corporation. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corporation was a jukebox manufacturer, and of the rest of the M1 Carbine manufacturers, only Winchester was a firearms manufacturer. Tanks and parts thereof were manufactured by General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Detroit Diesel and pretty much every other automotive company. Chevrolet alone manufactured 60,000 Pratt & Whitney bomber and cargo plane engines; 500,000 trucks; 8 million artillery shells; 3,000 90 mm cannon barrels; 1 million tons of aluminum forgings; 1 million tons of grey iron castings; 2,850 tons of magnesium forgings; and 3,800 T-17 Staghound armored scout cars. But that's all in the past. There's no reason why the manufacture of computer and electronic components couldn't be moved back to the US, other than the whining of e-children miffed that their precious toys have increased in price and the deep disappointment of corporate parasites who have come to expect outrageous returns on their investments. "The idea of moving shoe manufacturing to advanced countries is a little bit of a farce," opined Ed Van Wezel, the CEO of Hi-tech International Holdings BV, an Amsterdam-based shoemaker that sells about 30% of its shoes in the U.S. On the contrary, if CEOs are not allowed to earn a king's ransom, with that ransom covering the jobs lost by employees whose jobs are outsourced, we can easily do it. New Balance, a company owned by former marathoner Jim Davis and his wife Anne, manufactures higher-end and customized shoes. New Balance is the only company which offers its shoes in multiple widths so customers can obtain an optimum fit, as compared to Walmart's one-Chinese-made-width-fits-all. New Balance makes about one quarter of the shoes it sells in the U.S. and estimates that its shoes cost 25% to 35% more than if they were made in Asia. The main difference between New Balance and the other shoe companies is that New Balance does not have to answer to Wall Street and its neurotic demands for higher profits. The US is the prize in terms of markets, along with the EU. All countries want to sell goods here. We have the leverage, but we refuse to use it because American capitalists have a direct line to Congress and the White House. Libertarians have always been wrong on free trade treaties and their effect on jobs. Doug Bandow of the Cato Institute argued during the Clinton administration: "The silliest argument against PNTR is that Chinese imports would overwhelm US industry. In fact, American workers are far more productive than their Chinese counterparts ... Moreover, Beijing's manufacturing exports to the United States remain small, about half the level of those from Mexico." Daniel J. Ikenson of the Cato Institute argued in 2006: "In fact, since China joined the WTO in 2001, US exports to China have more than doubled." He went on to say: "And the notion that importing from and offshoring to China is hollowing out American manufacturing is not supported by the facts." Ikenson later doubled-down on his vitreol, saying that "it is beyond doubt that certain Chinese policies have been provocative, discriminatory, protectionist, and, in some cases, violative of the agreed rules of international trade" and that "U.S. policies, politics, and attitudes have contributed to rising tensions, as have rabble-rousing politicians and a confrontation-thirsty media." Pat Buchanan pointed out in February 2007: "To the devout libertarian, free trade is not a policy option to be debated, but a dogma to be defended. Nowhere is this truer than at that lamasery of libertarianism, the Cato Institute." He went on to say: "For contrary to free-trade mythology, every nation that has risen to pre-eminence and power -- Britain before 1860, the United States from 1860-1914, Germany from 1870-1914, postwar Japan, China today -- has pursued a mercantilist or protectionist trade policy ... It is no accident all four presidents who made it to Mount Rushmore were protectionists." A look at Census Bureau trade data shows that the trade balance with China started off even in 1985, but became a rather ominous deficit over time, with a 2015 ratio of 483,244.7 / 116,071.8, both in millions of dollars, translating to 4.16 and not in our favor. Comparable figures for Mexico and Canada are 296,407.9 / 235,745.1 = 1.26 and 296,155.6 / 280,609.0 = 1.06, respectively. But then again, libertarians have never been proficient with history, math, or honesty. Walmart is the best example of a corporatist monopoly which would have been broken up during more enlightened times, with its ruthless demands for its suppliers to move production out of the US so Walmart can sell their products at a price no other retailer can touch. Libertarian jackals always warn that Walmart t-shirts would become more expensive if outsourcing were curtailed, like that is some sacrosanct measure of economic strength, ignoring the fact that the economy only grew at 2% per year during Obama, 2.7% during Bush the Younger, and 3.5% during Clinton, as compared to the 4% before that. Not coincidentally, Chinese imports have increased at a staggering rate since the 1990s. The Flint-Detroit corridor is the most dangerous one in the country largely because auto industry jobs have left. One would think that liberals would appreciate that outsourcing and H-1B visas hurt African Americans even more than they do other Americans. But since screwing the American worker has become one of the only bipartisan activities in Washington, politicians have joined forces to reduce life expectancy for white Americans. Not coincidentally, the same thing happened to Russians immediately after the implosion of the Soviet Union. Among the 10 countries for which the Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks manufacturing employment, Australia, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden had higher manufacturing wages and lost smaller shares of their manufacturing employment than the US between 2000 and 2010. Those countries have socialized medicine, six or more weeks of vacation, and extended maternity benefits. Germany and other European countries have union representatives sitting on corporate boards. The US, on the other hand, lost 6 million manufacturing jobs between early 2001 and late 2009. It's not coincidental that China was allowed to enter the World Trade Organization in late 2001 after the Clinton administration led the cheerleading section for the event. Bill Clinton promised at the time: "We don't have to transfer technology or do joint manufacturing in China any more," but China did require most companies to transfer technology, as Siemens, Alstom, Bombardier, Kawasaki, ThyssenKruppp, and Weinig AG discovered to their financial detriment. In mid-2015, the ratio between average American CEO pay and worker pay was over 300-to-1, with some sources claiming a ratio of 354-to-1 or even 373-to-1. In 1965, that ratio was 20-to-1. In Germany, that ratio is 167, but workers there earn almost $6,000 more than the average American worker. Wall Street actively lobbies Washington to allow Chinese companies to buy American ones even if it's obvious that the Chinese company only wants the patents and other intellectual property, because Wall Streeters will make a killing on the deal. Even companies involved in chip manufacture, one of our remaining bastions, are being eagerly pursued by Chinese companies with Wall Street assistance. This confirms the old Bolshevik saying about capitalists selling the rope with which they will be later be hung, except that ordinary Americans will be dragged to the gallows along with them. Today's four largest job creation sectors, retail, restaurants, temporary staffing firms, and home health care, wouldn't be able to transform themselves into industries capable of weapons manufacturing. In other words, we could not act as the arsenal of democracy or win WWII today. But China could, though its arsenal would be of an entirely different nature. We should remember that China has been learning how to take down the Internet, stolen much of the design for the F-35, the fighter we have bet the farm on, and just about perfected its anti-satellite weapons, even though its use of them could fill orbital space with junk, preventing further launches of satellites or manned spacecraft. It would require more than eight years at a wartime tempo to replace the stocks of major weapons systems. The clock is ticking. |
AuthorPete Prunskunas Archives
March 2023
Categories |